Plasticex009 from the Spudtech Forums was kind enough to offer up HVPL-01 (doesn't that roll across the tongue with ease?) for our reading pleasure and information. He has his own webpage dedicated to this gun so if you want more details, feel free to follow that link.
Plasticex009 sent the GGDT data file linked below this paragraph. I've gone in and used the Cv calculator to tweak the valve flow coefficient, but otherwise I am totally taking his word for any data found in the model.
With all that said, here's the two data sets compare...
| Pressure | Measured fps (avg) | GGDT fps | Deviation |
| 95 psi | 856 | 932 | 8.9% |
| 100 psi | 891 | 947 | 6.3% |
| 120 psi | 987 | 1001 | 1.4% |
| 125 psi | 1063 | 1013 | 4.7% |
| 130 psi | 1080 | 1024 | 5.2% |
As you can see, agreement is good. Not spectacular, but good. What I do find interesting is it's performance on the ends of the pressure spectrum. At lower pressures GGDT overestimates gun performance while underestimating performance at the higher pressures. This is exactly opposite of the trend shown by the data from my "Shorty" gun. And to be perfectly honest? I have no theories to explain the situation or improve the model. If you have any, I'm all ears.
And for those who want to see it, here's the raw shot data
| Pressure | Measured fps |
| 95 psi | 856 |
| 100 psi | 891 |
| 120 psi | 924, 1049 |
| 125 psi | 1054, 1071 |
| 130 psi | 1001, 1115, 1085, 1097, 1118, 1065 |
Note: If you came here via a direct link from somewhere else, odds are you'll want to click here.